Media reporting school achievement gaps appears to perpetuate racial stereotypes that lead people to blame students鈥攔ather than structural racism鈥攆or poor academic performance,聽.
TV coverage of achievement gaps leaves viewers with “exaggerated stereotypes of black Americans as lacking education and may have increased implicit stereotyping of black students as less competent than white students,” says the study by聽, an assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California.
Quinn noted that U.S. presidents and education secretaries have framed the racial achievement gaps as major civil rights issues in order to prioritize equity in education.
鈥淗owever, researchers have expressed concern that by focusing on student outcomes, rather than on structural inequities that lead to the outcome disparities, this framing assumes a deficit orientation that reinforces stereotypes and has a detrimental effect on public support for policies aiming to end structural inequities,” Quinn says.
More from 91看片: Study finds inequitable pathways to education leadership
Participants in the study watched either a short TV news story that emphasized gaps in test-scores between black and white students, or a promotional piece created by that portrayed black students as studious and academically ambitious in a healthy school environment.
Participants were then told the national high school graduation rate for white students (about 85% in 2013) and asked to guess the same rate for black students. Those who watched the first report guessed 49.4% while those who saw the promotional piece said 55.7%.
But both groups vastly underestimated the success of black students, who graduated high school at a rate of 78% in 2013.
However, the study found that neither video had an impact on whether the viewers thought closing achievement gaps should be a priority.
It also didn’t change the聽factors they believed were responsible鈥攕uch as聽school quality, student motivation, parenting, discrimination and racism, genetics, neighborhood environments, home environments, and income levels.
鈥淭hese findings do not mean that we should cease all measuring or reporting on between-group differences in outcomes,鈥 Quinn said. 鈥淩ather, what we need is a better understanding of how certain ways of framing inequalities may be more or less impactful on people’s racial attitudes and how we can most productively conduct a public conversation about advancing equitable policy without also perpetuating harmful stereotypes.鈥
More from 91看片: How Miami-Dade schools aim to tackle the 鈥楥OVID slide’
