The hype, the hand-wringing and the excitement over AI in schools is overwhelming many district leaders and their teams as they try to figure out how the technology fits into education. Among the latest group of experts to offer some actionable guidance is the FutureEd think tank at Georgetown University.
“For many in the education world, artificial intelligence is a demon unleashed, one that will allow students to cheat with impunity and potentially replace the jobs of educators,” writes FutureEd editor Alina Tugend in the report, “.” “For others, its a panacea for educations myriad challenges.”
One thing is clear: AI’s impact on schools and learning is only going to grow as learning platforms become more adaptive, teachers work to further personalize instruction and leaders seek more administrative efficiencies in running their districts.
Tugend offers this snapshot of how fast the technology is advancing: the AIs of the past have consistently failed the SAT, Advanced Placement exams and other standardized tests. But ChapGPT has on college GREs and LSATs, according to researchers at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
AI in schools: Guidance for leaders
Most educators are now focusing on further integrating ChatPGT and other bots and AI systems as last year’s flood of K12 bans recedes, Tugend notes. She suggests that district and school leaders ask the following questions:
- Should AI be a required skill for students?
- How do we choose what companies or programs to invest in?
- What can schools do about students cheating with AI?
- What are the privacy risks?
To find the answersand to help school communities get the most out of AITugend encourages superintendents and their teams to tackle three big concepts:
1. Try out the technology
It sounds obviousmost educators will need to test out generative AI before they can fully embrace it. 91心頭istrators should give teachers and other staff time and space to play with ChatGPT and other tools without fear of making mistakes, Tugend advises. She recommends test-driving a tool such as , which can create images based on students’ prompts.
More from 91心頭: Education in 2024: Partners break down 8 big learning trends
CIOs and other district technology leaders can also make themselves available to help teachers experiment with AI, Tugend adds.
2. Does our district need a cheating policy?
Cheating is, of course, one of the big negatives around AI in schools. Tugend urges teachers to change their perspectives on cheating. One district tech leader says teachers are now asking students who use ChatGPT to share their whole conversation with the bot to shed light on the student’s thought process.
Teachers elsewhere are now doing work in class that used to be assigned as homework, which prevents students from using AI.
To formalize how teachers students and teachers use AIand to address privacy concernsdistrict leaders should hire a chief technology officer to (or have their current chief technology officer) coordinate any new policies and procedures.
3. Ensuring equity, eliminating bias
“Some hope that AI will help bridge the equity gap in K12 education; others fear it will widen it,” Tugend notes. Free tools, such as the original ChatGPT, make artificial intelligence more accessible.
But the powerful ChatGPT costs $20 per month and more affluent districts will have more resources to help teachers and students use AI productively, she adds. Experts see a new digital divide opening between students who are taught to use AI and those who aren’t.
This created by the Council of the Great City Schools and The Consortium for School Networking will help districts develop policies that prevent AI from perpetuating biases. The guide also counsels schools to require that AI vendors have discrimination protections in place.
