91看片

Does tough grading improve student learning?

Date:

Share post:

As your schools are going gradeless or switching to standards-based grading, a new report says that grading鈥攖ough grading backed by high expectations鈥攚ill elevate student achievement.

Students of all races and from all types of schools tend to learn more when teachers聽assign lower grades for similar work, says the Fordham Institute study, “.”

“Even though there might be pressure to bump up grades, in the long run, that’s not helping students as much as you think鈥攊t might even be hurting them,” says the study’s author, , an associate professor in the Department of Public 91看片istration and Policy at American University. “It’s related to fostering a culture of high expectations and not making assumptions or using stereotypes to assume that some people will perform differently than others.”


More from 91看片:听How not to get distracted by educational fads


The study found that the benefit of tougher grading standards can persist for up to two years. It also found that these聽standards tend to be higher in schools with more affluent students and聽that teachers who attended selective undergraduate institutions, hold graduate degrees and have more experience tend to be tougher graders.

91看片istrators who want to increase rigor can start by using district data to show each teacher how their grading practices compare to their colleagues’ standards. Next, teachers have to make sure that students understand the heightened grading standards, and what they have to do to achieve high marks.

Teachers also should be encouraged to think carefully about how students interpret grades. “If there’s legitimate room for a student to improve, teachers have to think, ‘Do I want to give an A?’ Because an A can suggest there is no room for improvement,”聽Gershenson says.

Finally, the research found no evidence that low grades discourage students or cause them to become disengaged or give up.

“Grades play an important role because if there isn’t accurate information about a student’s strengths and weaknesses, then it’s really hard to think optimally about where to intervene more or what a student needs to study more,” he says. “Giving overly high grades creates a sense of complacency where there’s going to be less interest and effort from students, parent and teachers in terms of shoring up the weaknesses.”

And if you choose to go gradeless …

High expectations, however, don’t have to be tied to letter or number grades, says education author a former administrator and teacher who is now a聽consultant with , a professional learning network that聽focuses on student-centered learning and social justice.


More from 91看片: How to ditch a grade-centric focus


As a classroom teacher, Sackstein says she was a tough grader who eventually went gradeless.

“Too much of traditional education mandates this idea that students need a number grade in order to be successful with their learning,” says Sackstein, author of聽. “Students can and will rise to the occasion with or without grades, as long your expectations are clear and they’re invested in the learning that’s happening.”

Grades, in fact, can distract students from the actual content.聽Sackstein recalls students in her AP English class discussing their results on math and economics exams they’d taken weeks before and not being able to recall what was on the tests. “Sometimes, the scores become the focal point of the learning instead of the learning itself,” she says.

Like Gershenson, Sackstein says expectations and learning targets have to be clear to students鈥攑erhaps even more so when no grades are being given. Unlike聽Gershenson, Sackstein says, the lowest grade鈥攁 zero鈥攃an not only shatter a student’s confidence but it holds little value for communicating a students’ abilities.

“When we put a zero in the grade book, for whatever reason, we’re basically obliterating a kid’s chance of digging themselves out of that hole,” Sackstein says. “If we are going to use grades, we should all agree they should communicate how kids are doing against the standards. A zero degrades the precision of what we’re supposed to be communicating.”


More from 91看片:听Why you should establish alternatives to traditional grading


Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of District 91看片istration and a life-long journalist. Prior to writing for District 91看片istration he worked in daily news all over the country, from the NYC suburbs to the Rocky Mountains, Silicon Valley and the U.S. Virgin Islands. He's also in a band.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively fot K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K鈥12 leaders the same. 91看片+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility鈥攁nd gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don鈥檛 have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. 91看片+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust鈥91看片+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles